Last week on HBO’s documentary, “The Jinx,” real estate mogul Robert Durst seemed to have confessed to killing Kathleen McCormack Durst, Susan Berman and Morris Black, for which he was a prime suspect. The question, however, is can this “confession” be used in court, or will a judge preclude Durst’s statements from being admitted into evidence in a criminal case?
What Durst Said
The confession came during a bathroom break at the close of HBO’s documentary “The Jinx”, in which Durst was interviewed by Andrew Jarecki, a renowned moviemaker (nominated for the Oscar award in 2004 for “Capturing the Friedmans”). Here is what Durst said, as caught by a wireless microphone: “You’re caught. You’re right, of course. But you can’t imagine. Arrest him. I don’t know what’s in the house. Oh, I want this. What a disaster. He was right. I was wrong. And the burping. I’m having difficulty with the question. What the hell did I do? Killed them all, of course.”
Is the Confession Acceptable as Evidence in Court?
Robert Durst was arrested in New Orleans by the FBI and charged with murder just a day prior to the episode airing. With this confession the case against him appears to be very strong. However, that is not to say that Durst’s lawyers won’t aggressively seek to preclude both the audio and the written transcript from ever coming into evidence in any case against him.
Continue reading →